<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>/dev/psychology &#187; Teaching</title>
	<atom:link href="http://p.einarsen.no/tag/teaching/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://p.einarsen.no</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 11:29:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The double hump of programming classes</title>
		<link>http://p.einarsen.no/the-double-hump-of-programming-classes/</link>
		<comments>http://p.einarsen.no/the-double-hump-of-programming-classes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teaching]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://p.einarsen.no/?p=132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently, the distribution of marks in introductory courses to programming looks like this: How come? Some people just get it and some don&#8217;t? A failure of teaching? See the discussion at Mik&#8217;s blog. I don&#8217;t necessarily agree that this is caused by people falling behind and not being able to catch up (although that is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, the distribution of marks in introductory courses to programming looks like this:</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.kent.ac.uk/mik/2009/09/04/quality-oriented-teaching-of-programming/"><img class="alignnone" src="http://blogs.kent.ac.uk/mik/files/2009/09/chart1.png" alt="" width="480" height="308" /></a></p>
<p>How come? Some people just get it and some don&#8217;t? A failure of teaching?</p>
<p>See the <a href="http://blogs.kent.ac.uk/mik/2009/09/04/quality-oriented-teaching-of-programming/" target="_blank">discussion at Mik&#8217;s blog.</a></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t necessarily agree that this is caused by people falling behind and not being able to catch up (although that is probably also a problem).  If that was the case, you would probably see a skewed single peak distribution, as one of the commenters suggest.</p>
<p>Rather, I think the either/or explanation is the right. Now does that mean people in the left hump will never be able to learn, or are doomed to a life of poor understanding of programming? I think not, but how to move them to the &#8216;get it&#8217; group is another matter..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://p.einarsen.no/the-double-hump-of-programming-classes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

