<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Psychology of Perl talk links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://p.einarsen.no/psychology-of-perl-talk-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://p.einarsen.no/psychology-of-perl-talk-links/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 22:53:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zbigniew Lukasiak</title>
		<link>http://p.einarsen.no/psychology-of-perl-talk-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1209</link>
		<dc:creator>Zbigniew Lukasiak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 19:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://p.einarsen.no/?p=349#comment-1209</guid>
		<description>I am just looking at the  Update on the Natural Programming Project video - and wow - there is so much surprising info there!  In particular create-set-call versus required params - this goes very much against the trend of &#039;immutable objects&#039; (although it should be possible to reconcile those two) - and yet it feels true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am just looking at the  Update on the Natural Programming Project video &#8211; and wow &#8211; there is so much surprising info there!  In particular create-set-call versus required params &#8211; this goes very much against the trend of &#8216;immutable objects&#8217; (although it should be possible to reconcile those two) &#8211; and yet it feels true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

