<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Objects and your brain: Why do we love object-oriented programming so?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://p.einarsen.no/objects-and-your-brain-why-do-we-love-object-oriented-programming-so/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://p.einarsen.no/objects-and-your-brain-why-do-we-love-object-oriented-programming-so/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 22:53:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radian Programming Language &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Verb- versus noun-based models in cognitive psychology</title>
		<link>http://p.einarsen.no/objects-and-your-brain-why-do-we-love-object-oriented-programming-so/comment-page-1/#comment-1162</link>
		<dc:creator>Radian Programming Language &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Verb- versus noun-based models in cognitive psychology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://p.einarsen.no/?p=140#comment-1162</guid>
		<description>[...] the blog Psychology of Programming, these excerpts from a 1995 paper on object-oriented programming published in Human-Computer Interaction have some fascinating comments from cognitive psychology [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the blog Psychology of Programming, these excerpts from a 1995 paper on object-oriented programming published in Human-Computer Interaction have some fascinating comments from cognitive psychology [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zan Usi</title>
		<link>http://p.einarsen.no/objects-and-your-brain-why-do-we-love-object-oriented-programming-so/comment-page-1/#comment-1104</link>
		<dc:creator>Zan Usi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://p.einarsen.no/?p=140#comment-1104</guid>
		<description>@Drug : Programming is not about modeling. It is about getting utlility from the computer; the user could not care less if there is some model behind the program or not. When modeling helps to develop and maintain the program, then use it, but I do not think that it is some automatic prerequisite to program construction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Drug : Programming is not about modeling. It is about getting utlility from the computer; the user could not care less if there is some model behind the program or not. When modeling helps to develop and maintain the program, then use it, but I do not think that it is some automatic prerequisite to program construction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dru Nelson</title>
		<link>http://p.einarsen.no/objects-and-your-brain-why-do-we-love-object-oriented-programming-so/comment-page-1/#comment-896</link>
		<dc:creator>Dru Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 00:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://p.einarsen.no/?p=140#comment-896</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad you brought this up again. I believe all programming is really about human modeling and perception. Good post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad you brought this up again. I believe all programming is really about human modeling and perception. Good post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Siegrist</title>
		<link>http://p.einarsen.no/objects-and-your-brain-why-do-we-love-object-oriented-programming-so/comment-page-1/#comment-895</link>
		<dc:creator>John Siegrist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 23:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://p.einarsen.no/?p=140#comment-895</guid>
		<description>It looks like OOP was adopted widely in the industry so that programmers could escape the tyrrany of structured programming methods and the heavy processes that became associated with them.  So I&#039;m not surprised to see that there was only a small amount of evidence supporting the claim that OOP was great.  I believe we saw the same sort of enthusiastic response to agile methods and probably for much the same reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like OOP was adopted widely in the industry so that programmers could escape the tyrrany of structured programming methods and the heavy processes that became associated with them.  So I&#8217;m not surprised to see that there was only a small amount of evidence supporting the claim that OOP was great.  I believe we saw the same sort of enthusiastic response to agile methods and probably for much the same reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

